Purpose The purposes of this study were to analyze the course outcomes of integrated courses of a medical school that introduced an outcome-based curriculum and to suggest ways to improve techniques in the description of outcomes.
Methods In order to investigate the course outcomes of 39 courses in the first and second grades at Kyungpook National University School of Medicine in Korea, verbs for the course outcome were classified according to Bloom’s taxonomy and frequency analysis was completed. The appropriateness of use of verbs in description of the outcomes was also analyzed.
Results The total number of course outcomes for both grades was 497. The number of course outcomes per credit ranged from a minimum of 0.9 to a maximum of 22.0. Most of the course outcomes were classified as the comprehension domain according to Bloom’s taxonomy. The most frequently used verb was “explain,” accounting for 61.0% (n=303) of the entire course outcome verbs. Some verbs in the outcomes, however, were unmeasurable.
Conclusion The major findings of this study include the followings. First, the number of course outcomes varied according to courses. Second, several course outcomes included unmeasurable verbs. Finally, most of the verbs used to describe course outcome belonged to the two lower levels of Bloom’s taxonomy—knowledge and comprehension. In order to improve the description of course outcomes, this study suggests that it is necessary to adjust the number of course outcomes, applicate overt behavior verbs, and elevate the level of course outcomes from the lower memorizing level to the higher application level.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cognitive alignment and assessment validity in a high-stakes dental specialty examination: a Bloom’s taxonomy-based analysis Hülya Çerçi Akçay, Nilüfer Üstün BMC Medical Education.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Application of the flipped classroom model based on Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in endodontics education for undergraduate dental students Yaru Wei, Zhengjun Peng PeerJ.2025; 13: e18843. CrossRef
Reimagining the Undergraduate Medical Education Systems-Based Course: An Example for the Cardiovascular System David E. Winchester Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.2025; 24(4): e0401. CrossRef
Twelve tips for using the Understanding by Design
®
curriculum planning framework
Alana D. Newell, Cara A. Foldes, Alison J. Haddock, Nadia Ismail, Nancy P. Moreno Medical Teacher.2024; 46(1): 34. CrossRef
Purpose This study was designed to allow a student at School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University (KNUSOM) to self-assess how well they had achieved competency and to analyze the differences and trends of the scores by year. Furthermore, students are asked to evaluate the need for curriculum improvement by competency, the tendency of the score is analyzed by year, and the results are reflected in the improvement of the curriculum.
Methods We conducted a questionnaire survey for fourth-year students of KNUSOM who took medical education classes from 2015 to 2018. Questionnaire items were evaluated on the basis of their current achievement of 30 subordinate competencies of competency and the degree of necessity with respect to revising the curriculum. One-way analysis of variance was performed for the yearly difference analysis.
Results The students’ scores on the graduation competency were 2.03 to 4.06. In the yearly difference analysis, there was no significant difference in the average of 30 total competencies, but 16 of the sub-competencies showed significant year-to-year differences. The scores for the 30 graduation competencies were different for each year, but the competencies showing high scores and low scores were found to be similar each year.
Conclusion We found that the achievement level of the students was approximately 60% to 70%. We were able to confirm the contents of the education that the students continuously demand. The curriculum trend graphs for each year showed that the students‘ scores improved when the curriculum was being revised. We found that it is necessary to accept the students’ self-evaluation reliable as the students indicated that the contents of the curriculum should be added to the areas where the contents were lacking in the present curriculum.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Self-assessment practice scale among nursing and midwifery students: psychometric properties of the Persian version Mojgan Firouzbakht, Hamid Sharif-Nia, Zeinab Gholamnia Shirvani, Saeideh Ghaffarifar Teaching and Learning in Nursing.2026; 21(2): e666. CrossRef
A Study on Teaching Method Preferences and Learning Competencies Based on Learning Styles of Korean Medicine Students Suji Lee, Hye-Yoon Lee, Sunju Im Korean Journal of Acupuncture.2025; 42(1): 19. CrossRef
Integration of early clinical exposure into curriculum enhances self-assessment of professional competencies in medical practice Tsuyoshi Oshiro, Shintaro Suzuki, Naoki Kagawa, Himawari Ono, Rieko Goto, Atsuko Furuta, Makiko Arima, Shizuma Tsuchiya, Hiroaki Ogata, Edward Barroga, Miki Izumi BMC Medical Education.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating the Strengths and Barriers of Competency-Based Education in the Health Professions Jennie B. Jarrett, Abigail T. Elmes, Eden Keller, Cindy D. Stowe, Kimberly K. Daugherty American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.2024; 88(6): 100709. CrossRef
Teaching-learning behavior in medicine according to students’ perspective: what most influences academic achievement? Mia Kusmiati, Susanti Dharmmika, Asri Maharani Dewi F1000Research.2023; 10: 1157. CrossRef
Implementation of a Healthcare of Elderly Course With Multi-Professional Teachers for Undergraduate Medical Students in a Public University in Malaysia—A Quasi-Experimental Pre and Post Study Zhi Ling Ng, Hazwan Mat Din, Nor Fadhlina Zakaria, Liyana Najwa Inche Mat, Wan Zul Haikal Wan Zukiman, Anim Md Shah, Ummi Nadira Daut, Hakimah Mohammad Sallehuddin Frontiers in Public Health.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Teaching-learning behavior in medicine according to students’ perspective: what most influences academic achievement? Mia Kusmiati, Susanti Dharmmika, Asri Maharani Dewi F1000Research.2021; 10: 1157. CrossRef
First
Prev
