Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSME
  • E-Submission

KJME : Korean Journal of Medical Education

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS

Page Path

2
results for

"Young Jon Kim"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Young Jon Kim"

Original Article
Analysis of the Relationship between Students' Seating Preferences and Academic Achievement in Medical School
Hyo Hyun Yoo, Ji Hae Park, Jung Su Kim, Hyoung Tae Kim, Young Jon Kim, Dong Chan Kim
Korean J Med Educ 2012;24(2):117-125.
Published online June 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2012.24.2.117
PURPOSE
This study aimed to explore the relationship between students' seating preferences and academic achievement in medical school.
METHODS
The subjects of this study were 109 second-year students in C medical school. The pattern of seat selection of 109 students was surveyed by participant observation for 48 days, and a questionnaire was administered to determine the factors that were considered by students. Using SPSS version 12.0, we analyzed the factors that students considered with regard to seat selection and seat preference and the frequency of seat movements between areas. We performed one-way ANOVA to analyze the differences in academic achievement between students who moved seats versus those who did not.
RESULTS
The most common reasons for seat selection were to focus better on the lecture (60 students), to focus better on lecture, and to feel familiar with the same seat (60 students). Students' preferred seats were in rows A4, A7, A5, and A3 (in descending order), which are primarily the central sections, and columns B15, B1, B14, B19 (in descending order), which are primarily both ends of the division. The difference in academic achievement between students who moved seats and those who did not was not significant (p>0.05). Among students who did not move seats, the difference in academic achievement between 9 seating areas was not significant in 6 subjects (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest that we should reconsider a professor's general perception regarding academic achievement according to seat location.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Educational Equipment Arrangement Study for Classroom Seat Position Preference & Educational Efficiency
    Kyung-Il Chin
    KIEAE Journal.2020; 20(1): 87.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Academic Relationships on Academic Burnout in Health Professions Students
    Junhwan Jang, Seonhwan Bae, Gyungjae Kim, Doyoung Kim, Junseong Park, Seunghyeon Lee, Mira Park, Do-Hwan Kim
    Korean Medical Education Review.2019; 21(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Research trends in studies of medical students’ characteristics: a scoping review
    Sung Soo Jung, Kwi Hwa Park, HyeRin Roh, So Jung Yune, Geon Ho Lee, Kyunghee Chun
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017; 29(3): 137.     CrossRef
  • Medical Teacher: Monster or Mystery?
    Bomtaeck Kim
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2012; 24(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • 14,835 View
  • 122 Download
  • Crossref
The Development Study of a Medical Ethics Education Program by Using Simple ISD Model
Young Jon Kim, Hyoo Hyun Yoo, Chan Uhng Joo
Korean J Med Educ 2011;23(3):185-192.
Published online September 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.3.185
PURPOSE
Simple instructional systems design (ISD) model is based on a fast development, usability test, and continuos feedback, which are necessary for educational program development in medical school. This study aims to figure out the usability of Simple ISD model for a medical ethics education program by describing a developmental details of each phase and its evaluation results.
METHODS
Research has been conducted in two steps. First, while researchers participated in the program development by using Simple ISD model, we collected empirical data of each development activities. Second, the developed program was evaluated by students' web-based usability test, a 8-students' focus group interview and 5 faculty members' individual interviews in 4 domains; learning contents, instructional methods and strategies, achievement evaluation, and self-evaluation.
RESULTS
Following the circular process of analysis, design, development, and usability test of Simple ISD model, a 10-week medical ethics program covering 9 instructional topics was developed. The average points of response on the developed medical ethics program in 2008 and 2009 are increased from 3.96 to 4.59 and 4.41, respectively. The prospects and limitations of the program are discussed.
CONCLUSION
From a development study of the medical ethics program by using Simple ISD model, we could implement a more usable medical ethics program, and found 4 different usability of the Simple ISD model; the rapid development of educational program, program improvement by continuous feedback, faculty members' engagement in instructional design, and professional development of the faculty members.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A Review of Undergraduate Medical Ethics Education in Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing in South Korea
    Eun Kyung Choi
    Korean Journal of Medical Ethics.2025; 28(3): 157.     CrossRef
  • Application of the Rapid Prototyping Instructional Systems Design in Meridianology Laboratory
    Eunbyul Cho, Jae-Hyo Kim, Jiseong Hong
    Korean Journal of Acupuncture.2022; 39(3): 71.     CrossRef
  • Medical ethics education in the medical school curriculum
    Jang Han Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2017; 60(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Investigating the Requirements of Good Teaching from Medical Students’ Perspectives
    Son-Hwan Choi, Hyo-Jin Ahn
    Korean Medical Education Review.2016; 18(3): 156.     CrossRef
  • Pain Control, Nutritional and Emotional Support
    Dong Hee Koh
    Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract.2015; 20(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Physicians' perspectives on social competency education in academic medicine
    Yun-Jung Heo, Ivo Kwon, Ok-Jin Rhee, Duck-sun Ahn
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2013; 25(4): 289.     CrossRef
  • 12,257 View
  • 109 Download
  • Crossref